@btutzer, please have a look in this commit considering also commits 6f957842b101, 2e12d19af9ae, 4f138adb30fa that give clarification (sorry for having documentation scatter in other commits).

Nitpick, but I do not like the doExecute function name. I would expect that such a function would really do something (have a side-effect). I think check or checkPending or something like that would me more appropriate.

In R20:3e6fe06d97aa877219c1be05f1e54d69b49f01d3#8555, @btutzer wrote:

Nitpick, but I do not like the doExecute function name. I would expect that such a function would really do something (have a side-effect). I think check or checkPending or something like that would me more appropriate.

I concur, doExecute hints that something would actually happen. Nevertheless, check does not sound right to me either. I would expect that a function called checkPending takes care of any pending stuff...

What do you think about shouldProcess? I find it a good descriptive function name: it tells whether processing should be done with respect to the parameters.

In R20:3e6fe06d97aa877219c1be05f1e54d69b49f01d3#8571, @juhasz wrote:

What do you think about shouldProcess? I find it a good descriptive function name: it tells whether processing should be done with respect to the parameters.

shouldProcess sounds good! Thanks!